- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:54:59 +1100
- To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I'm happy for that to be input to the editors -- or are you making a separate proposal? Cheers, On 17/03/2008, at 8:29 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > > Am 17.03.2008 um 07:43 schrieb Mark Nottingham: > >> The proposal is to: >> >> * In p2 10.1, change "The actual set of allowed methods is defined >> by the origin server at the time of each request." to "The actual >> set of allowed methods is defined by the origin server at the time >> of each request, and may not necessarily include all (or any) >> methods that the server would actually allow in a request if >> presented." (with normal editorial discretion) > > How about: > > "The published set of allowed methods is defined by the origin > server at the time of each request. The absence of methods in this > set has no defined semantics." > > >> >> * In p2 10.1, remove "However, the indications given by the Allow >> header field value SHOULD be followed." > +1 > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany > Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782 > > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 09:55:51 UTC