W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:54:59 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DC9AAB5C-3316-4753-B850-67F96ABACC4B@mnot.net>
To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>

I'm happy for that to be input to the editors -- or are you making a  
separate proposal?

Cheers,


On 17/03/2008, at 8:29 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:

>
>
> Am 17.03.2008 um 07:43 schrieb Mark Nottingham:
>
>> The proposal is to:
>>
>> * In p2 10.1, change "The actual set of allowed methods is defined  
>> by the origin server at the time of each request."  to  "The actual  
>> set of allowed methods is defined by the origin server at the time  
>> of each request, and may not necessarily include all (or any)  
>> methods that the server would actually allow in a request if  
>> presented."  (with normal editorial discretion)
>
> How about:
>
> "The published set of allowed methods is defined by the origin  
> server at the time of each request. The absence of methods in this  
> set has no defined semantics."
>
>
>>
>> * In p2 10.1, remove "However, the indications given by the Allow  
>> header field value SHOULD be followed."
> +1
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
> Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
>
>
>
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 09:55:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:37 GMT