- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:47:42 +0100
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Brian Smith" <brian@briansmith.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:22:37 +0100, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > At 13:36 08/03/17, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> What would it prove if we found no-one? That they aren't useful >> encodings, or that there aren't use cases for non-ASCII characters in >> headers? > > Good question. Maybe that the use cases for non-ASCII characters > aren't strong enough to justify the uglyness of the encoding? For style sheets attached through HTTP you'd want non-ASCII characters. So you can make meaningfull titles for content that can't be expressed with just ASCII characters: Link <test>;rel=stylesheet;title="foo" Link <alternate>;rel=stylesheet;title="bar" (imagine foo and bar are not ASCII or latin-1 compatible) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 07:47:40 UTC