On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 10:31 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > So it seems like it's either; > > a) change it to a response header, drop the request use case > b) change it to a general header (although that's not a perfect fit > either) > > I've heard some preference for (a) from other folks. +1. Regards HenrikReceived on Thursday, 13 March 2008 23:27:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:37 GMT