Brian Smith wrote: > There is no content-transfer-encoding in HTTP Yes, I confused CTE and TE, again. Some years ago all I wanted to know was how I can disable chunking, that turned out to be simple, use "GET whatever HTTP/1.0". > Content-MD5/Content-Encoding processing works exactly > the opposite way: | The MD5 digest is computed based on the content of | the entity-body, including any content-coding that | has been applied, but not including any transfer- | encoding applied to the message-body. Okay, so for some chunked gzipped content the MD5 is apparently for the gzipped content. I also read #40, if you want to update all RFC 4229 registrations the IANA considerations could get very impressive, maybe a bulk update will do, let IANA replace 4229 by 2616bis for <huge list of header fields defined in 2616bis>. FrankReceived on Friday, 29 February 2008 01:19:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:29 GMT