Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion

Mark Nottingham wrote:

> What did you have in mind?

Now I forgot it, maybe it was about the RFC 2617 erratum wrt
MD5-sess.  Or about extracting a "P3"-based proposal from the
"unknown text/* type" thread, to get rid of default Latin-1.  

 Frank

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 08:52:18 UTC