I already reported it to ietf-action (it appears to affect all WGs, from a sample I took yesterday). Cheers, On 07/02/2008, at 8:39 PM, David Morris wrote: > > > This might be a side effect of the ietf services transition. > I'm guessing this is a database field not being filled in. > > A reporting method was described on the ietf.org list if > someone can determine this was not an intentional change. > > Dave Morris > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 19:14:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:35 GMT