Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses

Are you saying that s/MUST/SHOULD/ is adequate, or agreeing that  
splitting it into two requirements, making the second a SHOULD, is  
necessary?


On 05/02/2008, at 4:47 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote:

>
> mån 2008-02-04 klockan 23:08 -0800 skrev Mark Nottingham:
>> My thinking was that it may be necessary to preserve the MUST on the
>> presence of the header (in case any software had been written to
>> depend upon its presence), but to loosen the implied requirement that
>> the list of headers be complete.
>
> SHOULD is more than sufficuent for a such requirement level.
>
> Regards
> Henrik


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:39:35 UTC