W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:56:37 +0100
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Werner Baumann <werner.baumann@onlinehome.de>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1199714197.26411.1.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On mån, 2008-01-07 at 12:05 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> I think you meant "PUT is idempotent, just as GET/DELETE".

Yes, I did. The word is a bit alien to me and I frequently get it

> Idempotence doesn't imply the byte transformation is repeated exactly.

No, but predictably and not dependent on itself which was the point I
was trying to make.


Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 13:56:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:44 UTC