Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses

On mån, 2008-01-07 at 12:05 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> I think you meant "PUT is idempotent, just as GET/DELETE".

Yes, I did. The word is a bit alien to me and I frequently get it
wrong..

> Idempotence doesn't imply the byte transformation is repeated exactly.

No, but predictably and not dependent on itself which was the point I
was trying to make.

Regards
Henrik