W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Issue 72

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:12:43 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <g40pk4$4pn$1@ger.gmane.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

>     +---------+-------------+
>     | Method  | Reference   |
>     +---------+-------------+
>     | CONNECT | Section 8.9 |
>     | DELETE  | Section 8.7 |
>     | GET     | Section 8.3 |
>     | HEAD    | Section 8.4 |
>     | OPTIONS | Section 8.2 |
>     | POST    | Section 8.5 |
>     | PUT     | Section 8.6 |
>     | TRACE   | Section 8.8 |
>     +---------+-------------+

Let's add RFC&rfc.number; in the "reference" column of all rows,
with an editorial note somewhere stating that RFC&rfc.number;
has to be fixed on publication - automatically, but after IANA
created the registry; some readers might not know how it works.

> possibly add text about the pros and cons of defining new
> methods.

IMHO obvious, getting deployment would require a miracle, but
it happens.

 Frank
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 19:11:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:48 GMT