W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:53:38 +0200
Message-ID: <48512A62.5090708@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I think a separate document to populate the registry is a good idea.
> ...

OK,

so the current proposal would be to have:

- the method registry inside Part2, modeled similarly to the status code 
registry (-> IETF review required),

- the registration for methods defined in Part 2 inside Part 2 (IANA 
Considerations)

- an additional document, referencing Part 2, and making the 
registrations for all other methods

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2008 13:54:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:48 GMT