Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think a separate document to populate the registry is a good idea. > ... OK, so the current proposal would be to have: - the method registry inside Part2, modeled similarly to the status code registry (-> IETF review required), - the registration for methods defined in Part 2 inside Part 2 (IANA Considerations) - an additional document, referencing Part 2, and making the registrations for all other methods BR, JulianReceived on Thursday, 12 June 2008 13:54:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 October 2011 12:14:02 GMT