On 3 Jun 2008, at 17:31, Julian Reschke wrote: > 1) What's the standards status of Content-Disposition? > > - it's defined in RFC2616, but it says: "Content-Disposition is not > part of the HTTP standard, but since it is widely implemented, we > are documenting its use and risks for implementors." (in the > Security Considerations) > > - the initial registry (RFC4229) says "standard" (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4229#section-2.1.22 > >) > > - however the actual registry (<http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html > >) doesn't mention a status > > -> I'm tempted to leave it as defined in registry, so with no entry > for the standard status Content-Disposition is defined in RFC 2183 ( http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2183.txt ), or am I missing something subtle? The University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland : No SC013532Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 12:06:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 October 2011 12:14:02 GMT