Re: i28 proposed replacement text from Henrik Nordstrom on 2008-06-02 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2008)

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:14:23 +0200
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1212423263.4192.22.camel@henriknordstrom.net>

On mån, 2008-06-02 at 11:31 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Yves Lafon wrote:
> > >As already mentioned both gzip and deflate has this property to a
> > >sufficient level.
> > 
> > But it is used that way in deployed servers/clients ? Or is chunked 
> > encoding always the norm.
> 
> Chunked encoding clearly is not the norm when sending compressed
> dynamic content to a HTTP/1.0 client.

We are talking about transfer-encoding and message delimiting, not
content-encoding.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Monday, 2 June 2008 16:15:22 UTC