- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 17:59:57 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ok... RFC2616 has: LWS = [CRLF] 1*( SP | HTAB ) Substituting "SP | HTAB" by "WSP" (as defined in RFC5234) gets us to LWS = [CRLF] 1*WSP Now, <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sasl-rfc2831bis-12#section-7.1> has: LWSP = *(WSP / CRLF WSP) which can be rewritten as LWSP = *([CRLF] WSP) (right?) which seems to equivalent to RFC2616's *LWS: STARLWS = *([CRLF] 1*WSP) So should RFC2616bis adopt the LWSP production used in RFC5234? BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 16:00:41 UTC