W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: i28 proposed replacement text

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 21:49:14 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1211572154.30132.7.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On fre, 2008-05-23 at 14:30 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Changing things to refer explicitly to "chunked" may help;
> 2. If the Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41) is present  
> and contains the "chunked" value, the transfer-length is defined by  
> the use of the "chunked" transfer encoding.
> Note that 3.6 already requires that the chunked value be listed if  
> chunking is in use.
> 3.6 would still benefit from:
> Whenever a transfer-coding is applied to a message-body, the set of  
> transfer-codings MUST include "chunked", unless the message indicates  
> it is terminated by closing the connection.

Looks fine to me.


Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 19:50:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:48 GMT