W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: [#116] ETags and concurrency control

From: Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 19:19:02 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Robert Siemer <Robert.Siemer-httpwg@backsla.sh>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "atom-protocol@imc.org" <atom-protocol@imc.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B61A7A087BA4AB4FB95694FC184A111C329265682C@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

This is now implemented in Astoria, so I guess we already have 1 working implementation of this nit in the spec :)

More seriously, the effective/fast discussion and turn-around of this clarification was great. appreciated.


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:46 AM
To: Henrik Nordstrom
Cc: Mark Nottingham; Pablo Castro; Mark Baker; Robert Siemer; Brian Smith; atom-protocol@imc.org; HTTP Working Group
Subject: Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control

Julian Reschke wrote:
> OK.
> It seems this one is ready for closure.
> If there are no objections, I'll apply the change proposed in
> <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/116/i116.diff>
> tomorrow.
> BR, Julian

Done with <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/245>.

BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2008 02:19:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:45 UTC