This is now implemented in Astoria, so I guess we already have 1 working implementation of this nit in the spec :) More seriously, the effective/fast discussion and turn-around of this clarification was great. appreciated. -pablo -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:46 AM To: Henrik Nordstrom Cc: Mark Nottingham; Pablo Castro; Mark Baker; Robert Siemer; Brian Smith; atom-protocol@imc.org; HTTP Working Group Subject: Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control Julian Reschke wrote: > OK. > > It seems this one is ready for closure. > > If there are no objections, I'll apply the change proposed in > <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/116/i116.diff> > tomorrow. > > BR, Julian Done with <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/245>. BR, JulianReceived on Sunday, 18 May 2008 02:19:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:47 GMT