W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 09:11:36 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <84C0ECA7-52A7-43B8-B3C4-C6B0F5089314@mnot.net>
To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>


Yeah. Anybody else want to weigh in pro or con on this?


On 10/05/2008, at 9:02 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> Too many frigging bytes.  Define them as sie= and swr=.
>
> ....Roy
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 23:12:11 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology"
Previous message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt"
In reply to: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt"
Next in thread: Brian Smith: "Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt"
Reply: Brian Smith: "Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt"
Reply: Stefan Eissing: "Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:47 GMT