W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt

From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 13:46:19 +0100
Message-ID: <4820531B.10103@icra.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@mnot.net>, 'atom-syntax Syntax' <atom-syntax@imc.org>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

I can only apologise for my incompetence.

Thanks, Julian - it all works now, so the results are clearly that 
Firefox (2) and Opera (9) already implement HTTP Link (and that I need 
to be a lot more careful with my syntax).

Meanwhile, I'm working with Jonathan Rees to turn some of the material 
he's gathered at http://esw.w3.org/topic/FindingResourceDescriptions 
into a note to send to the TAG for possible discussion of this issue. 
Let's hope we can get it resolved...


Julian Reschke wrote:
> Phil Archer wrote:
>> Sorry...
>> OK, I've removed the /="/" but but I still get the same results - 
>> Firefox doesn't recognise the stylesheet link.
>> So why does it work with Anne's page?
>> His header is
>> Link: <fancy.css>; rel=stylesheet
>> mine is now
>> Link: <styles.css>; rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"; title="Style 
>> Sheet";
>> So it looks like I should try removing the quotes around stylesheet, 
>> or may the type and title? ... whichever, the two implementations 
>> (Firefox and Opera) are not in alignment. C'Úst la vie I guess.
> There's still a ";" missing between rel= and type=.
> BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 12:46:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:45 UTC