Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

Debbie Garside wrote:

> Rather than re-inventing the wheel, why not just go
> with what is already written within RFC4646bis-12 

That's an idea if and after 4646bis was approved plus
eight weeks.  For now 2616bis drafts can reference
RFC 4646, all details are explained within RFC 4646.

That the "x" in x-pig-latin is no "primary subtag"
in RFC 4646 terminology isn't relevant for 2616bis,
and the example is a fair warning for implementors.

 Frank