W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

[ietf-http-wg] <none>

From: Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:44:07 -0700
Message-ID: <F1962646D3B64642B7C9A06068EE1E6402D4F6D4@ex10.hostedexchange.local>
To: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/browser/draft-ietf-httpbis/02
/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-02.txt says:

    8.6.  PUT
    The PUT method requests that the enclosed entity be stored under the
    supplied Request-URI.

RFC2616 says the same. I've run into several people now who thought
"under" implied "at a subpath of the Request-URI" (yes, even though the
following text clearly contradicts that). To reduce confusion, can we
change "under" to "at"?


Robert Brewer
fumanchu@aminus.org
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 19:44:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:47 GMT