W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:08:43 -0400
Message-ID: <e9dffd640804032008uc3f0473lcf0cdd0f4e09bd1c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "Charles Fry" <fry@google.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, google-gears-eng@googlegroups.com

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>  However relying on non-compliance of proxies in this case would be
> foolhardy.  Changing the semantics of Expects I don't think is that great an
> option either (actually I'd vote to deprecate it along with 305 Use Proxy)

+1

Mark.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 03:09:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:46 GMT