W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:45:16 +0200
Message-ID: <47F4C34C.7060405@gmx.de>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

David Booth wrote back in last October...:
> That isn't the case I meant.  Sorry I was unclear.  I meant a case where Ua, Ub and Uc are all different URIs and:
>  - Ua denotes an information resource R;
>  - Ub denotes the *same* information resource R; and
>  - Uc denotes some other information resource.
> When Ua is dereferenced, a 303-redirect to Uc is returned, but when Ub is dereferenced a 200 Okay is returned with a huge amount of data.  And when Uc is dereferenced, a 200 Okay is returned with content describing R and how it can be accessed via Ub.

If Ua and Ub denote the *same* resource, why are they behaving differently?

What's your definition of "same" here?

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 11:46:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:45 UTC