W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:36:00 +0100
Message-ID: <47753400.4090605@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Henrik Nordström wrote:
> fre 2007-12-28 klockan 17:19 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
>> Hm. Do you really think it's SHOULD NOT, not MUST NOT?
> My starting point is SHOULD NOT for anything which does not cause
> immediate interoperability breakage.
> If diskussions find that violating this is really harmful, not only
> slightly confusing to the unsuspecting then upgrade the criteria to MUST
> NOT.
> It depends a bit on what the wording regarding error handling will be.

Well, if conflicting information in Content-Length headers doesn't cause 
interop problems, what will?

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 28 December 2007 17:36:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:44 UTC