W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:47:11 +0100
To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1195804031.824.7.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On ons, 2007-11-21 at 22:33 -0800, David Morris wrote:

> > Should be a chunk extension, not new length.. i.e. something like
> >
> > 0; aborted

> Only if current recipients will not ignore the 'aborted' and consider the
> entity complete.

Why?

What's important is that current recipients correctly understands that
as "end-of-message".

We are talking mainly about aborting the request entity after the server
have already said "I am not interested", not the response entity.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Friday, 23 November 2007 07:47:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:23 GMT