- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:33:29 -0800 (PST)
- cc: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On ons, 2007-11-21 at 18:32 -0800, David Morris wrote: > > > Also, I thing the notion of a chunk length of -1 deserves further > > discusion. Seems to me that if a recipient understands the new value as > > abort, then the connection can continue to be used. If the recipient > > doesn't understand the signal, it should be treated as a serious error > > resulting in an abort of the request and connection. If I've not missed > > something, that leaves older recipients protected while allowing a useful > > tweak to the protocol. > > Should be a chunk extension, not new length.. i.e. something like > > 0; aborted Only if current recipients will not ignore the 'aborted' and consider the entity complete.
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 06:33:45 UTC