W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: Via MUST discussion

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:16:34 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1195002994.14389.127.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On ons, 2007-11-14 at 11:25 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> OTOH, making this requirement a SHOULD is probably closer to  
> reflecting current practice, especially if we were to have some  
> explanatory text about it.


There is no reason to have MUST level requirements without any
noticeable impact on the operations of the protocol. And Via is
certainly in that category.


Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 01:16:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC