Re: Via MUST discussion

On ons, 2007-11-14 at 11:25 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> OTOH, making this requirement a SHOULD is probably closer to  
> reflecting current practice, especially if we were to have some  
> explanatory text about it.

+1

There is no reason to have MUST level requirements without any
noticeable impact on the operations of the protocol. And Via is
certainly in that category.

Regards
Henrik