W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis)

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:30:01 +0200
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20071017153001.GA17150@nic.fr>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:15:31AM -0700,
 James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 46 lines which said:

> In the case that a new header or other type of mechanism is needed,
> I would think that it would be entirely possible and appropriate to
> draft that up in a separate I-D.

I don't think this was Lisa's point. The proposed charter says nothing
about one I-D or several (as in Roy's proposal). But it forbids any
addition to HTTP and Lisa's point was that it is too strict and too
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 15:30:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 October 2015 05:36:25 UTC