W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis)

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:30:01 +0200
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20071017153001.GA17150@nic.fr>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:15:31AM -0700,
 James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 46 lines which said:

> In the case that a new header or other type of mechanism is needed,
> I would think that it would be entirely possible and appropriate to
> draft that up in a separate I-D.

I don't think this was Lisa's point. The proposed charter says nothing
about one I-D or several (as in Roy's proposal). But it forbids any
addition to HTTP and Lisa's point was that it is too strict and too
early.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 15:30:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:23 GMT