SRV records in scope? (Was: WG Review: HyperText Transport Protocol Bis (httpbis)

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:21:22 +0200 To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Message-ID: <20071017122122.GA25400@nic.fr> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:23 GMT

On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:15:01PM -0400,
 IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 75 lines which said:

> The Working Group must not introduce a new version of HTTP, and
> should not introduce new features or capabilities to HTTP.

So, are SRV records, as described in
http://www.anta.net/nic/draft-andrews-http-srv-01.shtml in scope or
not? It is not a change of HTTP itself. And the lack of these records
is a big problems for Web servers hosters. 