W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: normative references

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:43:17 +1000
Message-Id: <7CF36375-A410-4492-8CB5-C95319A517AF@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

Now i86.

<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i86>


On 15/09/2007, at 8:25 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> while others work on the progress issues, I'd like to close some of  
> the more trivial issues in the current draft.... Here's the first one:
>
> Normative up-to-date references
>
> The references below are normative and should be classified as  
> such. None of them needs updating:
>
> RFC1864 ("The Content-MD5 Header Field")
>
> RFC2045 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One:  
> Format of Internet Message Bodies")
>
> RFC2046 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two:  
> Media Types")
>
> RFC2047 ("MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three:  
> Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text")
>
> RFC2119 ("Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels")
>
> RFC2617 ("HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access  
> Authentication")
>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 06:45:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:22 GMT