Re: NEW ISSUE: normative references

Now i86.

<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i86>


On 15/09/2007, at 8:25 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> while others work on the progress issues, I'd like to close some of  
> the more trivial issues in the current draft.... Here's the first one:
>
> Normative up-to-date references
>
> The references below are normative and should be classified as  
> such. None of them needs updating:
>
> RFC1864 ("The Content-MD5 Header Field")
>
> RFC2045 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One:  
> Format of Internet Message Bodies")
>
> RFC2046 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two:  
> Media Types")
>
> RFC2047 ("MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three:  
> Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text")
>
> RFC2119 ("Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels")
>
> RFC2617 ("HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access  
> Authentication")
>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/