W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2007

RE: RFC 2617 Authentication-Info BNF

From: Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:19:40 -0700
To: Tim Olsen <tim@brooklynpenguin.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <042C7D611172EE4A98E7B9AF81D1178C876ADB2C99@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Olsen [mailto:tim@brooklynpenguin.com]

> The "nextnonce" is optional. To see why, ask yourself if
>         Authentication-Info rspauth="ab10f00baa"
> is legal according to the ABNF. Hint -- what does "1#" mean?

ok, I understand that technically.  But what is the purpose of having
square brackets around the other directives, but not around nextnonce?
[Paul Leach] I don't know. It may have just been an oversight.
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 16:19:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC