W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-09.txt]

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:08:53 -0400
Message-ID: <e9dffd640709091608v229c60eew6451881b61057ee4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Henrik Nordstrom" <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Cc: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Why not PATCH with If-Match?

On 9/9/07, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> On mån, 2007-09-10 at 00:41 +1200, Adrien de Croy wrote:
>
> > Fair enough.  Just still trying to think of what a poor UA / user would
> > do once they've been told their patch won't be accepted because the
> > thing they are patching has been changed out from underneath.
>
> Then LOCK, GET, [edit], PATCH, UNLOCK, or depending on the use case
>
> GET, LOCK with If-Match, [edit], PATCH, UNLOCK
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>


-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2007 23:08:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:16 GMT