http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i75 On 19/06/2007, at 8:53 AM, Jeffrey Mogul wrote: > > I understand there is an RFC on this - any pointers would be > appreciated, we are trying to redesign our cache. Supporting > HTTP/1.1 > and 1.0 properly seems difficult. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2145.txt > > There are references from RFC2616, section 3.1, to this document. > Perhaps these should be marked as normative; certainly, a proxy > implemention that violates RFC2145 is non-compliant in any reasonable > sense of the word. > > -Jeff > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 03:40:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:33 GMT