- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:40:17 +1000
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>
- Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i75 On 19/06/2007, at 8:53 AM, Jeffrey Mogul wrote: > > I understand there is an RFC on this - any pointers would be > appreciated, we are trying to redesign our cache. Supporting > HTTP/1.1 > and 1.0 properly seems difficult. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2145.txt > > There are references from RFC2616, section 3.1, to this document. > Perhaps these should be marked as normative; certainly, a proxy > implemention that violates RFC2145 is non-compliant in any reasonable > sense of the word. > > -Jeff > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 03:40:35 UTC