W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: revised I-D draft-decroy-http-progress-01

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:15:18 +1200
Message-ID: <46B9A5C6.3080205@qbik.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Adrien de Croy wrote:
>> greatly simplified, and deals now purely with progress notifications.
>> ...
> Adrien,
> I think you'll need an I18N section.
OK.  I presume there is some standard for defining internationalised 
strings?  like UTF-8 or something similar to what is used in certain 
email headers.

> Also, they way you define the headers in terms of RFC4234, parsing 
> will be different from headers defined in RFC2616 (wrt to LWS...) Is 
> this intended?
probably not.  I'd intended only a single WS (designated by the "SP") 
but I'm not up to date with RFC4234.  I understand the parsing of HTTP 
was modified with 1.1 to allow pretty much any amount of contiguous WS 
to be treated as SP?



> Best regards, Julian

Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 11:13:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC