W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:23:51 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1186518231.19935.80.camel@henriknordstrom.net>

On tis, 2007-08-07 at 17:57 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:

> So, in general, PROPFIND (under Roy's definition of "requested variant") 
> wouldn't return the same ETag as GET (for the same Request-URI).

Correct. It would return the same ETag as a GET for the "GET location"
of the same PROPFIND results.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 20:24:08 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: New issue: Need for an HTTP request method registry"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND"
Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC