W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:32:05 +0200
Message-ID: <46B89075.5040109@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> 

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tis, 2007-08-07 at 14:25 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> (Such as a PROPPATCH with an If-Match header using a cache validator 
>> previously returned in GET).
> 
> ?
> 
> GET of what? The "original" Request-URI, or the GET-able location
> returned by PROPGET?

The Request-URI.

(It's PROPFIND, not PROPGET)

> Both should return the same ETag witch is that of the PROPGET results.

Why would they return the same ETag?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 15:32:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC