Roy T. Fielding wrote: > ... >> 210 Information returned > > No way. That is what Content-Location provides. We don't need a > Content-Etag header field -- the Etag response header field would > always have the same value. I have to disagree here. This is not what RFC2616 says, which defines the Etag in terms of the "requested variant". Let's clarify this one first! Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 6 August 2007 20:22:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT