W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt]

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:29:32 -0400
Message-ID: <e9dffd640708011729h208330e1ha27f7f3fcd695208@mail.gmail.com>
To: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 8/1/07, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> > So to be clear, are you now suggesting that a 200 PATCH response would
> > *not* have this specific meaning, and that only this new response code
> > would indicate that it did have it?  If so, great, we're in sync.
>
> Yes.

Great.

So I'm going to propose that we add this response code to the PATCH
draft.  What does everyone think?

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 00:29:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT