W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-08, was: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-08.txt]

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:03:48 +0200
Message-ID: <46AF6B74.60304@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: jasnell@us.ibm.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>> (*) So, what does "Content-Range" mean for PATCH?
> 
> I can certainly deal with something along these lines.  I agree this 
> kind of thing is poorly implemented and appreciate the testing.  If 2616 
> changes we could also change PATCH if the timing is right.
> 
> When should we attempt to have a HTTP Interop event?  A test suite like 
> LITMUS (in fact I think part of Litmus can be reused) would go a long 
> way towards alerting implementors to simple requirements that are easily 
> missed.  A test suite could attempt a PUT with "Content-BOGUS: MUST 
> FAIL" (assuming we kept this requirement) and expect to see at least 
> some kind of error if not a 501.

So again, what is the semantics of "Content-Range" in the context of PATCH?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 17:04:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT