W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Draft agenda for the HTTPBis BOF

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:22:46 -0700
Message-Id: <9E0BBD26-8667-4658-9033-4ACD1682432D@mnot.net>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Updated; see:
   http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07jul/agenda/httpbis.txt

For those not onsite, see:
   http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ietf/  (we're channel 5)
   http://www3.ietf.org/meetings/text_conf.html

Cheers,


On 09/07/2007, at 7:19 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>
> Greetings,
> Mark Nottingham and I will be chairing the HTTPBis BOF in Chicago.
>
> At this point I would like to solicit comments about the following  
> agenda proposal:
> ================================================================
> Agenda bashing, etc.                                   ( 5 mins)
>
> Technical presentations:
>
> Review of draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-03.txt:
> status and open issues                                 (25 mins)
> Review of existing HTTP authentication
> mechanisms: draft-sayre-http-security-variance-00.txt  (20 mins)
> Review of issues with HTTP caching and cookies         (15 mins)
>
> Discussions about the proposed WG Charter:
>
> General discussion about formation of the WG           (10 mins)
> - if no interest in the WG, then spend more time
> on discussing 2616bis issues
>
> Is revision of RFC 2617 in scope for the WG?           (30 mins)
> Should rewrite of RFC 2616 be allowed?                 (20 mins)
> Other issues with the proposed Charter                 (10 mins)
> Closing discussion about formation of the WG           (15 mins)
> ================================================================
> Total:                                                 150 mins
> ================================================================
>
> In particular, let me and Mark know if you think that some items  
> should be added or deleted.
>
> A couple of comments on this:
>
> The agenda consists of two parts: technical presentations at the  
> beginning and charter discussion at the end.
> Technical presentations should provide information on various  
> documents that *might* be in scope for the proposed WG. Mark and I  
> will poll BOF participants on whether various documents should be  
> in scope for the proposed WG, out-of-scope or whether they can be  
> done later.
>
> Also pay attention to the "General discussion about formation of  
> the WG" item. The idea is that if it is clear at this point that  
> there is no interest in formation of one or more HTTP related WGs,  
> then the remaining time can be spent on detailed discussion of  
> various issues in draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-03.txt.
>
> Regards,
> Alexey
>
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 23 July 2007 04:22:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT