W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:01:47 +0200
Message-ID: <46A22DEB.3060304@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> Now i70;
>   http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i70

For the record: I think that the text proposed by Roy is a big 
improvement, and that we should adopt it as-is.

For now, I have integrated it into 
<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#status.303> 


Also note that I added the following sentence to the Changes section 
(<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.section.F.4>):

	"Clarify that 303 responses can be cacheable. (Section 10.3.4)"

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 21 July 2007 16:02:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:15 GMT