- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:51:11 -0700
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>
- CC: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, 'Cyrus Daboo' <cyrus@daboo.name>, 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, 'Henrik Nordstrom' <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, 'Lisa Dusseault' <ldusseault@commerce.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Or.. leave the decision up to the server and the client can adapt accordingly. - James Jeffrey Mogul wrote: > [snip] > Which means, I think, that the right way to solve Cyrus's > problem is probably the one he suggested -- add an optional > method to the PUT request that causes PUT to return the resulting > entity. > > -Jeff >
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:51:20 UTC