Done. On 28/05/2007, at 10:10 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi, > > can we please mark the following issues as closed? > > - Issue 45 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/ > #i45>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/ > draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i45-rfc977-reference>. > > - Issue 46 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/ > #i46>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/ > draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i46-rfc1700_remove>. > > - Issue 47 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/ > #i47>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/ > draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i47-inconsistency-in- > date-format-explanation>. > > - Issue 48 (<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/ > #i48>), fixed at <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/ > draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.i48-date-reference-typo>. > > > > Best regards, Julian > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 12:40:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:27 GMT