W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: RFC2617, digest domains

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:03:17 +1200
Message-ID: <466E2915.8000000@qbik.com>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: lists@ingostruck.de, "etf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>


with load-balancing and round-robin DNS it's not even necessarily the 
same IP.


Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> mån 2007-06-11 klockan 23:15 +0000 skrev lists@ingostruck.de:
>
>   
>> I would say that this means that for "no value" both
>> http://foo.com and https://foo.com are the same protection space,
>> because they inevitably refer to the same server (apart from technical
>> fancy foods like transparent nat a/o transparent proxying).
>>     
>
> Do they? Those two URLs refer to different services (ports) on the same
> IP.. It's obviously the same IP, but is it the same server?
>
> Yes, it's quite common that the same content is available via both and
> that both services is under the same administrative realm or even same
> server software instance, but not guaranteed by any means.
>
> Would you also consider http://www.example.com/ and
> http://www.example.com:8080/ as the same server?  I don't..  For me the
> server is identified by scheme://host:port  (or just host:port, wich
> scheme just telling what protocol is run on that port)
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>   
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 05:03:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:10 GMT