W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:06:22 +0200
Message-ID: <46682CFE.50707@gmx.de>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently going through 
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html>, 
> checking for changes that currenly do not appear in the issues list at 
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/>.
> This is one of these... (in context: 
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.section.13.3.3>): 
> ...

OK, as that example (showing that W/"1" and "1" may match weakly) 
obviously didn't have consensus after all, I have backed it out from the 
-latest draft. I still think the questions needs to be answered, though.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 16:06:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:10 GMT