Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Eliot Lear wrote:
> An authentication requirements document sits in "Last Call" right now as 
> we speak.  My concern is that we'll close 2616bis only to discover that 
> not only do we need a 2617bis but also a 2616bisbis.  The only real 
> question is whether or not we can move fast enough on the auth work so 
> that you're not left twiddling your thumbs too long.

Pointer, please :-).

Best regards, Julian