W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:58:27 +1000
Message-Id: <12B1D91A-7DD3-4B73-91ED-DF019388EB29@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>

Now issue 56;
   http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i56


On 2007/01/11, at 10:23 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> The second sentence in the first paragraph can on a quick reading be
> misread as section 10 contains a complete definiton of all possible
> status codes, where it in reality only has the status codes defined by
> this RFC.
>
> Change
>
> These codes are fully defined in section 10.
>
> Into
>
> The status codes defined by this RFC is fully defined in section 10.
>
> hinting that it's a good idea to read further..
>
> Regards
> Henrik


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 07:58:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:09 GMT