W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: NEW ISSUE: editorial bug in 13.5.1

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:41:14 +0100
Message-ID: <458297EA.9040900@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Henrik Nordstrom schrieb:
> Jeffrey Mogul schrieb:
>>     Proposal: just say...:
>>     
>>         Other hop-by-hop headers MUST be listed in a Connection header
>>         (Section 14.10).
> 
> ons 2006-12-13 klockan 11:44 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
> 
>> 	Future revisions of the HTTP/1.1 specification and later
>> 	versions of HTTP MAY introduce new hop-by-hop headers. Those
>> 	headers MUST be listed in a Connection header (Section 14.10)
>> 	for backwards compatibility with this specification.
> 
> Think I prefer Jeffs simple and concise definition. We also have RFC2145
> (even if informal) which do guide future specification authors how to
> read this..
> ...

Ack.

See proposed fix in 
<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.13.5.1-connection_misleading>.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 12:41:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT