W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: DELETE and ETag

From: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:12:42 -0800
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0FBB5686-33EB-430F-BC4C-7A436338BDE4@wsanchez.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>


   I don't see a downside, really, but it seems like anything that  
does find this useful if misusing the concept of ETag.

	-wsv


On Nov 4, 2006, at 2:38 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> So is it OK to return an ETag in response to a successful DELETE,  
> when a  subsequent GET would return a 404?

Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 19:12:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega: "Re: Etag-on-write, 4rd attempt (== IETF draft 03), was: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-etag-on-write-03.txt"
Previous message: Stefan Eissing: "Re: ETags vs Variants, was: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "DELETE and ETag"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 03:48:54 GMT