On 11/4/06, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote: > lör 2006-11-04 klockan 17:07 -0500 skrev Robert Sayre: > > > A new RFC can make a header mandatory for RFCNNNN compliance, but not > > HTTP/1.1 compliance. > > Exacly what I said. OK. Then I submit that such an RFC cannot claim to define HTTP/1.1. -- Robert SayreReceived on Saturday, 4 November 2006 22:27:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 03:48:54 GMT