W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Revising RFC2616 - what's happening

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:04:05 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5j0fj25p4b7l4khsllc3jpe9ps2kh7uat4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Julian Reschke wrote:
>Not convinced. For instance, the definition of HTTP URLs currently seems 
>to fit into two pages. Regarding the other areas you mention, it may be 
>non-trivial to separate them properly.

I am not sure how the page count matters here. As for the other areas,
yes, that's precisely why it should be done. It may be that we do not
have the resources to actually split them, but I don't see anything
inherently bad about doing it if we do have the resources to do it,
quite the contrary.

>> There is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/http-compliance/ btw.
>
>Well, that group doesn't seem to be active, so I'd recommend to have 
>these kinds of discussions over here.

Perhaps, I am just saying the subscribers of that list might have use-
ful information available, or be interested to join such an effort.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 14:04:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT