W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: security requirements

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:56:04 +0200
To: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.thlbfqk064w2qv@id-c0020.wanadoo.nl>

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:28:06 +0200, Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since there are so many ways to approach this, so many variations in
>> what specs are revised and how they depend upon each other, I can't
>> say whether I, or the IESG, expect a revision to RFC2616 to "step
>> into" the area covered by RFC2617.
>
> Perhaps we should poll the HTTP community as a start. Does anyone
> think mandatory-to-implement security mechanisms will be helpful and
> realistic?

There's some interest in this area, fwiw:  
http://www.w3.org/Security/Activity


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 23:56:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:49:53 GMT